Credit: Public Sector Unsplash/CC0
Dental implants have revolutionized the treatment of the lacking teeth, providing a reliable and aesthetically pleasing alternative to traditional dentures and bridges. However, the failure of the implant remains alarming, especially in the first two years after installation.
Despite developments in surgical techniques and materials, various factors can endanger the success of implants, leading to complications such as infections, bone loss or lack of integration with Jawbone.
A new study published in Biomedia and biomedical It determines the main risk factors that contribute to implant failure and develop a prediction model to improve clinical results for patients with partial defects.
Basic findings
A comprehensive analysis of 300 patients undergoing dental implantation procedures revealed that several clinical and behavioral agents have significantly affected longevity. The study found that patients who smoke after implant placement had a much higher risk of failure. Smoking reduces blood flow and prevents healing, negatively affecting bone completion.
The implants placed on the front of the mouth were more likely to fail than those on the back. This may be due to differences in bone structure and the distribution of bite forces. And additional risk factors, including poor oral hygiene, the number of implants placed, inadequate bone volume and inadequate keratinized mucosa also played a role in the failure of the implant.
While the overall rate of implant failure was relatively low (5.67% over two years), understanding these risk factors is essential for both patients and clinicians to optimize the success of treatment.
For patients, recognizing amendable risk factors – such as smoking and oral hygiene – can authorize them to make lifestyle changes that improve implant longevity. “Our study emphasizes the crucial role of patients’ habits to determine the success of implant,” says lead researcher Dr. Dake linghu. “Treating these factors early, we can significantly reduce the risk of failure.”
For clinical doctors, findings underline the importance of personalized treatment planning. Implant placement in the front area requires special attention to bone density, mucosal width and the forces of obstruction to improve stability. The study also highlights the need for detailed preoperative evaluations and the training of patients to enhance the long -term results.
Current challenges and future directions
Despite the effectiveness of dental implants, the challenges remain in the prediction and prevention of failure. Existing risk assessment models continue to evolve and longevity of implantation can be affected by a combination of biological, mechanical and behavioral factors.
Future research will focus on refinement of prognostic models for the best identification of high -risk patients before surgery. In addition, developments in implant materials and techniques-such as bioactive overlays and 3D implants-may help improve success rates.
By incorporating these findings into clinical practice, both patients and dental professionals can take precautionary measures to minimize complications and enhance the long -term success of dental implants.
More information:
Dake Linghu et al, Predictors of implant failure: a comprehensive analysis of risk factors in the restoration of oral implant in patients with some defects of teeth, Biomedia and biomedical (2025). DOI: 10.17305/BB.2024.11668
Reference: Understanding dental implant failure: Basic risk factors and future directions (2025, March 17) was retrieved on March 21 2025 by
This document is subject to copyright rights. In addition to any fair treatment for private study or research, no part can be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided only for information purposes.